Friday, March 11, 2016

Education, Society, and National Development

by May Anne Joy de Lara-Romanes
University of the Philippines Diliman
March 11, 2016


           Education plays a very important part in nation building. I believe that nation building is the ultimate purpose of education—that if an individual is well-educated, then he/she will most certainly contribute in a positive way to the general welfare of his/her country. Because education is very important to us as it generally dictates our future as separate individuals and as a nation, we should use it to provide relevant and effective solutions to our existing problems, which can be traced from our past.

            First of all, I strongly believe that our education should be based on our own culture; our culture is our identity and it’s what truly makes us. Unfortunately, we were not taught, or rather not educated, based on our own culture but based on the culture of the foreigners, who forcibly invaded our country.

Back in the Spanish era, our ancestors, the Indios, were educated to be subservient of our first colonizers. We were taught to obey the Spaniards without asking any questions. From this time, most of us, Filipinos, lost the respect that we have for ourselves. When the Americans came, we were educated based on their culture and not ours. They taught us to love their culture more than our own; thus, it gave birth to our perennial illness of colonial mentality, and death of our little love for our own identity as Filipinos. I wonder ‘If I ever lived in that time, would I be called an American, or a Filipino?’ I thought of this because, no matter what I do, I cannot be an American; however, I cannot be a Filipino because Philippines was still a colony of US at that time. When the Japanese came, they aimed to remove the influence of the West on us, but these Asian colonizers did not succeed. Elevazo and Elevazo wrote in 1995 that the murder of thousands of innocent civilians, the abuse of our women, and a million tales of injustice just made us, Filipinos, more steadfast in our friendship with the Americans. After the Japanese left, we had our so-called ‘independence’ but, are we really independent? Are we really free from the influence of the foreigners? I don’t think so.

            Now, let’s talk about the present. What kind of Filipinos are we trying to produce? (Elevazo and Elevazo, 1995) Can we produce a Filipino out of the Western-type of education? How about producing one out of the Oriental education? It’s like asking: “Can an apple tree bear a mango fruit? And if it is possible, how would you react about it?” I don’t know about others, but I would find it hilarious to find such weird tree, just like a foreign educational system trying to produce a pure nationalistic Filipino, who would someday build his own nation out of his purest intentions of serving it for the welfare of the present and the future.

            At this point, I have some questions in my mind: “If Ferdinand Magellan didn’t find the Philippines, would the Filipinos be the same?”; “If we successfully built our primitive society out of our love for dignity, honor, nobility, and discipline, would our educational system be better?” (Gregorio, 1976, p.13); and “If the colonizers weren’t able to invade our country, would we be more progressive or less progressive as what we are now”? All these questions are yet to answer, but one thing is for sure, our philosophy of education should root from our true Filipino culture, because lack of culture means what it always meant: ignoble civilization and therefore, imminent downfall (Wright as cited by Morley in 2014).


References:
Elevazo, A. O. & Elevazo, R.A. (1995). Philosophy of Philippine education.
Manila: National Bookstore, Inc.

Gregorio, H. C. (1976). Introduction to education in Philippine setting.
Quezon City: Garotech Publishing.

Morley, M. P. (2014). Culture in design: the analysis of culture through semiotics and its role
in the automotive industry. Retrieved from
https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/4180/Thesis_Morley_v2.pdf? sequence=4.