Saturday, May 28, 2016

Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory: An Analysis part 7

Analysis of the Social Cognitive Theory


Though there are some good points mentioned about the social cognitive theory, it is still not far from the traditional behaviorist theories, which, somehow, Bandura is against to.  Even though Bandura included modeling, as one of the determinants of behavior, it can still be included in the environmental causes of behavior, simply because it is still an influence outside of a person.  The only difference is that the social cognitive theory recognizes the role of the cognitive factor in the production of a behavior.  Despite this, the results of the social cognitive theory still depend largely on the environment.  To illustrate, the traditional behaviorist and social cognitive theories can be compared to a mimosa plant (also called makahiya in Filipino).  Assuming the mentioned theories are absolute truths, whether or not we know that a mimosa plant has the pulvinus, its part that reacts to touch (assuming that part is their brain), or, whether or not we think that mimosa just merely reacts to touch regardless of its inner system, the causes of the resulting behavior will still be based on the things happening in their environment.  If this situation will just be the same with human beings, then what is the point of knowing that we use our brains when, we just solely behave based on our own human nature and the stimulus from our environment?  If we believe both theories completely, then we are accepting the fact that we mostly learn through our environment; therefore, it meant that even if we think, learn from other people’s experiences, find a model, or just plainly react to a stimulus, the behaviors and actions manifested are just the consequences of our exposure to the given environment.  For example, if a house is on fire, it does not matter if a person needs to think, find a model, remember an article about fire, or just go out of the house, because in the end, he will not be able to bear the heat of fire and will eventually move far from it.  If all of the mentioned illustrations in this paragraph are true, then it makes the social cognitive theory as hard to swallow as the traditional behaviorist theories, for they largely, if not wholly, rely on the environment, neglecting a lot of other factors that cause our behavior, such as our own beliefs and the results of our reflective thinking.